Reproduced directly from www.michaelsmithnews.com (could only see half of it and Crikey wanted me to join to view it at their blog).
I'm sitting on the bed in Michael Smith's Melbourne hotel room and he has a question
for me: "Do you feel dirty?"
Do I feel "tainted", he wants
to know, by venturing into "misogynist grubby nut-job headquarters"?
Smith is the former talkback host who
lost his job at Sydney
radio station 2UE last year for trying to pursue a 16-year-old story about a
union fraud committed by Julia Gillard's former boyfriend. Since then, the
shock jock in exile has continued to play a pivotal -- if almost totally
unacknowledged -- role in the resurrection of the story. And he's done it armed
with nothing more than an iPhone, an internet connection, a ring binder bulging
with documents and a conviction he's onto one of the greatest scandals in
Australian political history.
I'd assumed our interview, arranged 20
minutes beforehand, would take place in the CBD Rydges hotel bar. Over a drink
perhaps, given it's Friday afternoon. But it's not to be. "Why don't you
come up to the room?" Smith asks as if greeting a life-long friend.
He's sitting at his desk in an
open-necked business shirt, jeans and Blundstone boots. A pair of blue magnetic
reading glasses, which detach at the bridge, hang around his neck. Any thoughts
this would be a regular interview melt away as he thrusts an iPhone in my face
and starts questioning me. He uploads the file straight onto his
blog and comments start pinging in from his loyal band of
followers (warning: apparently your correspondent is not, according to
"Maggie1954", "the brightest bulb in the room").
In ratings terms, Smith never made much
of an impact -- he had a piddling 5.1% of the early-afternoon audience before
his departure. But he seems to have found his calling in blogging. Updated with
Andrew Bolt-style frequency and attracting around 90,000 page views a day, the
site has made Smith something of a cult leader for those obsessed by the AWU
affair. Funded by donations and his 2UE payout, it's trawled daily by
politicians and journalists looking for fresh material.
"Michael had sniffed the
seriousness of this story out before anyone had," said The Australian's Hedley Thomas, who has
led his paper's coverage of the AWU saga. "Michael has done a lot of the
work -- the digging, interviewing and fact-testing -- that the Canberra press gallery and many journalists
failed to do.
"I'm told that many in the Labor
caucus are refreshing their browsers on Smith's blog every day, and that the
PM’s staff are even more avid visitors to michaelsmithnews.com."
Smith, who declines to call himself a
journalist, was a latecomer to the media. A former police constable, army
corporal, Telstra executive and symphony orchestra managing director, he got
his break at another Fairfax-owned station, Brisbane 's 4BC, in 2007. While critics such
as Mark Latham dismiss him as a reactionary blowhard, it was he who cracked the
Craig Thomson scandal open last year in an interview with
the MP.
According to Thomas, Smith is
"well-intentioned", "forensic" and "highly intelligent".
He's also big-hearted, unguarded and foul mouthed: every sentence, it seems, is
peppered with "prick", "bastard", "f-ck",
"bullshit" or "d-ckhead".
For someone who's stuck at one story
for so long, he seems to have a remarkably short attention span. Getting him to
stay on topic is like wrangling a sugar-fuelled child to sit still and eat
their vegetables.
A question about his blog leads to a
display of photos from his time in Mogadishu
as a participant on this year'sGo Back To
Where You Came From series on SBS. "I thought every one of them had a bomb under
them," he says, pointing at a photo of women in burqas. He then gets
distracted by a photo of his wife, former concert pianist and current Australian Financial Review life and
leisure editor Katarina Kroslakova. Eventually, I manage to steer him to the
blog.
"If I had 30 hours in the day I'd
spend 30 hours a day on it," he says. "It's just my bloody obsessive
personality. I just want it to be so right and it's never enough and I'm always
feeling guilty I haven't done more work. I'm sitting here with you right now
and I'm thinking: how many more comments have come in? I can't help it."
The blog, however, is only the start of
his involvement in the story. A crucial reason police never charged anyone over
the fraud was the absence of a complainant. That changed when Smith went to
then Victorian police commissioner Ken Lay in October and lodged a complaint
about the alleged creation of false documents.
This set the stage for the arrival of
former AWU bagman Ralph Blewitt to finally give a statement to police. Smith
has become a confidant of the self-confessed fraudster, posts regular
interviews with him on his blog and has served as a conduit between him and
police. The pair -- whose connection is, in part, explained by both being
ex-army men -- recently shared a hotel room with two single beds. In TV
interviews with Blewitt last week, it was Smith hovering over his shoulder like
a nervous media adviser.
While Gillard derides Blewitt as a
"s-xist pig", "crook" and "imbecile", Smith
insists "he's a decent man at his heart".
"I've seen nothing in his recent
behaviour or statements to me to contradict the proposition that the bloke is
genuinely remorseful and speaking the truth now," Smith says of the Vietnam vet.
"Last night he came in with tears streaming down his face, holding his
phone, shaking, saying the boys serving in Tarin Kowt, Afghanistan had been on
the phone to say, 'good on you Ralph'. That’s what drives him I think."
Smith's eyes are watering and his voice is quivering.
![]() |
Michael Smith and Harry Nowicki in their |
Suddenly there's a knock on the door.
It's personal injury lawyer turned amateur historian Harry Nowicki -- the man
who tracked down Blewitt in Malaysia
and is financing his trip down under. Nowicki, who boasts a booming voice,
launches into an unprompted monologue detailing why the AWU story is a matter
of national importance.
"F-ck me you would have been a
good [police] partner mate," says Smith to Nowicki. "I would have
been the good cop and you could be the angry bastard." The two are in full
flight, feeding off each other's outrage, delighting in the left-wing perception
they are "right-wing misogynist nut-job conspiracy theorists swirling on
the internet in their web of intrigue".
"It's a scandal, it’s a cover-up,
it’s an immensely important insight into the installation of someone into a
position of authority," Smith hollers.
So is he after vindication? Surely he
wants to prove he was right and his 2UE bosses were wrong. "I couldn't
give a f-ck, mate," he says. "I'm telling the truth and that's what
counts."
As I head into the elevator I can still
hear the two men debating the significance of a document they've uncovered. I
don't feel tainted, but I'm definitely exhausted. It's time for that drink.
Comments