Kroey

It has been quite a white since I updated this blog. A friend and I have been running " Struth " on Facebook, but I think it's about time I started putting back into the blog. Here I'll include one of my favorite threads from that page, the Agenda 21 thread. For an overview of Agenda 21, here's a presentation by South Australian Politician Ann Bressington: To follow that up, watch some of Christopher Monktons videos on the subject (Entertaining too): And these informative videos from an ACTUAL climatologist Dr Dave Evans: Then there's this brief but informative video: Or this one for a much more in-depth expose: Want to know what the Scientific Elites think:  (Opens in Google Docs) One last thing to consider, the only nations concerned about Agenda 21/Climate Change are those nations that are in on the scam. The Russians have said as much . I've much much more to add to this subject. Click on the "Agenda 21" Label in the ...

Firstly, let me apologise to my friends who are environmentalists. I'm not trying to offend you, just wanna get this off my chest. Environmentalists get really upset with me when I say that Climate Change (a.k.a. Global Warming) is a religion, complete with: selling indulgences and tithing (Carbon Credits and taxes); Prophets (scientists, politicians, media executives and just plain old devotees) who lambaste the nay-sayers and critics; sermons (usually lavishly catered gatherings by invitation only so that there are no nay-sayers there, and paid for by the uninvited masses); Bibles ("An Inconvenient Truth", UN Agenda 21, blogs, websites, not to mention Government, UN, and NGO handbooks); the religious fervor that believers exhibit when their worldview comes into question; Miracles are a little different, they aren't 'good things' they're the 'bad signs' that affirm their belief i.e. Hurricane (actually it was a storm) Sandy, Katrina, etc,...

OPEN CLIMATE LETTER TO UN SECRETARY-GENERAL: Current scientific knowledge does not substantiate Ban Ki-Moon assertions on weather and climate, say 125-plus scientists. "The U.K. Met Office recently released data showing that there has been no statistically significant global warming for almost 16 years. During this period, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations rose by nearly 9% to now constitute 0.039% of the atmosphere. Global warming that has not occurred cannot have caused the extreme weather of the past few years. Whether, when and how atmospheric warming will resume is unknown. The science is unclear. Some scientists point out that near-term natural cooling, linked to variations in solar output, is also a distinct possibility." "The incidence and severity of extreme weather has not increased. There is little evidence that dangerous weather-related events will occur more often in the futu...

Just how much of the "Greenhouse Effect" is caused by human activity? It is about 0.28%, if water vapor is taken into account-- about 5.53%, if not. This point is so crucial to the debate over global warming that how water vapor is or isn't factored into an analysis of Earth's greenhouse gases makes the difference between describing a significant human contribution to the greenhouse effect, or a negligible one. Synopsis Water vapor, responsible for 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect, is 99.999% natural (some argue, 100%). Even if we wanted to we can do nothing to change this. Anthropogenic (man-made) CO2 contributions cause only about 0.117% of Earth's greenhouse effect , (factoring in water vapor). This is insignificant! Adding up all anthropogenic greenhouse sources, the total human contribution to the greenhouse effect is around 0.28% (factoring in water vapor). For all the figures please check out the article at  http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossil...